Reply with (pretend there's 3 dots here, discourse won't let me)

General
21

10^(TREE(10^(10^(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(10^67676767676767676767)))))))) + 1)) + 3

22

2^(10^(TREE(10^(10^(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(10^67676767676767676767)))))))) + 1)) + 3) + 1 - round(pi/3)

23

TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(googolplex^googolplex^TREE(googolplex^googolplex))))))) + tau

24

Ban imated, that’s not a natural number (irrational)

25

also please prove its even larger than my number lmfao

26

Tau is pretty notably not a natural number

27

it gets truncated like in C duh

28

it def is, a googolplex^googolplex^TREE( googolplex^googolplex) is prob already bigger than urs

29

Can we restart with 2 again pls, people are so mean and just skip to some big ass number :frowning:

1 Like
30

Prove that it is coprime with the previous one

31

2 (your previous sentence does not contain any numbers so 2 is bigger)

32

3 (yay we restarted)

33

4

34

(pretend there’s 3 dots here, discourse won’t let me)

35

2 (previous message reset it again, lets see how big we can get before we reset again)

36

3

37

4

38

49999 (yes it’s a complete sentence bruh)

39

(bro why go so high immediately?)